Wednesday, October 7, 2026
They Buried
We Dug It Up
⌕ Search

The Radar Needed 1.2 Megawatts. Something At Camp Hero Drew 4.6.

A third circuit ran into Camp Hero for thirteen years, eleven minutes on and forty-nine off, and nobody was ever invoiced for it. The commission kept the engineering tapes because it does not keep bills.

Analysis is written by news reporters and interprets facts they have verified. It is not opinion, and it takes no position on what should be done.

Eleven minutes on, forty-nine off, drawn the way both engineers drew it: something that fills, empties, and waits three quarters of an hour to do it again. Engraved for They Buried

A 13.2 kilovolt circuit left the Amagansett substation, ran east along a pole line under the Napeague strip, and terminated inside the Camp Hero fence.

It had no revenue meter. It had no account number. It appears on no bill anyone has ever been shown.

From 1974 to 1987 it loaded, at its peaks, to 4.6 megawatts.

The AN/FPS-35 radar on that site is rated at 1.2 megawatts on its own nameplate. That is not a guideline. The waveguide run between transmitter and dish is dimensioned for a peak power, and the plumbing, not the tube, is the ceiling. Push 4.6 megawatts through it and it arcs.

We appealed to the wrong body

A utility's records are organised around accounts, and we had asked a utility for accounts. So in June we asked a protection engineer a different question: if a circuit existed that nobody paid for, what record of it would have to exist anyway.

The answer is the protection-engineering series, held by the state public service commission rather than the company. Relay coordination studies. Fault-duty calculations. And loading tapes — four-hourly demand and reactive figures on every circuit, kept so that after a fault somebody can reconstruct what the line was carrying when the breaker opened.

Nobody reconciles those tapes against anything. They are not money. They are the reason this story exists.

The line the ledger writes it off under

Three circuits leave Amagansett's east bus. Two end at revenue meters, and those two meters are the entirety of what we published in August.

The third is carried in the substation's own loss ledger as station service, remote.

Station service is real and is properly unbilled: it is the power a substation spends running itself, and a company does not invoice itself. Amagansett's own station service sits on the same ledger, in the same hand, at between 19 and 34 kilowatts.

Feeder Three is on that line at four thousand six hundred.

Figure Three circuits leave the east bus. Two of them have a customer.
meteredno meterthe only recordAmagansett substation69/13.2 kV. Three circuits on the east bus.Feeder 1 — meteredRadar plant. 1.2 MW at transmit. Billed.Feeder 2 — meteredBarracks, well pump, guard shack. Billed.Feeder 3 — no meterSame fence. No account number. 4.6 MW.Station service, remoteThe ledger line Feeder 3 is written off under.Relay-target tapesLoading logged four-hourly for fault analysis.Camp Hero fenceAll three circuits terminate inside it.Two engineers, blindSite and the word radar withheld. Same answer.
Feeder 1 and Feeder 2 end at revenue meters, and those meters are the whole of what we published in August. Feeder 3 ends inside the same fence with no meter on it, and is carried on the substation's own loss ledger under station service, remote — the category a company uses for the power it spends running itself. Amagansett's actual station service, on the same ledger, is 19 to 34 kilowatts. Feeder 3 peaks at four thousand six hundred. They Buried, from the commission's relay-target tapes, the 1974 relay coordination study and the substation loss ledger, 1971–1988

Given to two engineers, blind

We removed the site, the state, the customer names and the word radar, and gave the tapes to two power engineers who do not know each other. Each was asked one question. What is this load.

Dr. Ottoline Serrure-Blaikie, thirty-one years a protection engineer, returned a cycle: eleven minutes on, forty-nine off, running through the working day and often through the night. Prof. Casimir Ndlovu-Traherne, working separately and by different arithmetic, returned the same cycle to within forty seconds.

Both read the reactive component the same way — a large capacitor bank charging and dumping — and both said, unprompted, that the load is not a factory.

They disagree about the bank's size by a factor of two, and both reports run with this story in full, including that disagreement.

The only other power calculation in our vault, PX-2004, was worked for us in May by a transmission engineer. He was not invited onto this panel, because a reader who has been paid by this newspaper before is not blind to it.

What the man at the substation says

Wendell Prosper-Kiang worked the Amagansett switchboard from 1969 to 1984. He confirms a third east-bus breaker, and a standing instruction, given verbally and never in writing, that its operations were not to be entered in the shift log.

He has never been inside the Camp Hero fence and does not know what the circuit fed. We asked him twice, three weeks apart. Same answer.

The denial is the story

Peconic Light & Power's reply runs at the foot of this page and we have not cut a word of it. Merrill Aughterson-Vance makes three engineering objections, and the second takes the first away from him: instrument error of fifteen per cent, he writes, does not get you from 4.6 megawatts to 1.2, and he is not going to pretend it does.

Then he writes the paragraph that matters. No service agreement. No account. No load letter. No design memorandum. No correspondence. A right of way, a pole line, a termination structure, and a padmount enclosure inside a federal fence his company has never had a key to.

The line was energised before his company's earliest record and switched out in 1988 on a work order that gives no reason.

What is still locked

The single-line drawing for the inside of that fence would settle all of this in one page. It sits in the Camp Hero property file, at a federal agency, 143 days past the date the statute gives it to answer us.

We will publish it when it comes. If it does not come by 30 November we will publish the refusal, the file number and the officer who signed it.

Disclosure. This newspaper paid $612 in copying charges to the commission and £4,400 in total to the two power engineers, who were paid the same fee, in advance, with no clause tying payment to any finding. The engineer who worked our vault's ground-conduction calculation was not invited onto this panel, because a reader who has been paid by us before is not blind to us.

How Others Covered This

The same events, as reported elsewhere on the same day. We list what each outlet had that we did not, as well as what we had that they did not — including where we come off worse. Why we print this.

  1. The Meridian Telegraph
    MONTAUK: THE SECRET CABLE THAT POWERED THE CHAIR

    Took our figure within four hours of publication and attached it to a named apparatus, a named programme and a named victim, none of which appear anywhere in the tapes.

    Had that we did not

    The 4.6 megawatts and the eleven-minute cycle, correctly, and faster than anyone.

    Left out

    That a load figure at a substation says how much and how often and nothing at all about what. The tapes measure four and a half miles from the fence.

  2. Signal & Ledger
    Unmetered Station Service: A Retention Problem The Commissions Have Not Faced

    A trade read for utility regulators on how a loss-ledger category becomes a place to keep a circuit nobody wants on a bill.

    Had that we did not

    The retention schedules, better than we have them, including the two states that destroy relay-target tapes at seven years.

    Left out

    The load itself. Four thousand six hundred kilowatts into a fence is described in their piece as an accounting anomaly and is not otherwise discussed.

  3. They Buriedthis newspaper
    The Radar Was Rated At 1.2 Megawatts. Feeder Three Carried 4.6.

    Went back to the body we should have asked first, bought the protection-engineering series, and had the loading read blind by two engineers who were not told what site it was.

    Had that we did not

    The full tapes, both blind reports in their entirety, and the company's reply at length and unedited.

    Left out

    We ran the wrong story on 22 August and it was read by more people than will read this one. Our correction is at the top of this page, where it belongs, and it is still a correction we would not have had to print if we had asked a protection engineer before we asked a billing clerk. — V. Ashcombe-Doyle, standards editor

Right of Reply

They Buried contacted Merrill Aughterson-Vance, Vice-President, Regulatory Affairs, Peconic Light & Power Company on 3 August 2026, in writing, with the full tapes, both blind engineering reports and the complete draft attached, and no deadline imposed. Replied 20 August 2026. Printed entire and unedited, including the parts about this newspaper.

Before anything else: your August story was wrong, and you have printed that at the top of this one rather than at the foot, which is more than the two other outlets that repeated it have done. I will give you that.

Now the rest of it.

You have found a category, not a secret. Station service, remote is an ordinary line in a loss ledger and it exists because a distribution company owns equipment that sits at the far end of a circuit and consumes power without being a customer of itself — reclosers, capacitor controllers, cathodic protection sets, communications huts. It is not billed because there is nobody to bill. Every operator in this state has such a line and every one of them would look exactly as sinister as ours if you printed only the largest number in it.

On your figures I have three engineering objections and I would like them printed in the order I am making them.

First, a relay-target tape is not a meter. It is an instrument record taken from current transformers selected for fault duty, not for accuracy at load, and its ratio errors at ordinary loading are not small. Our own standard treats those figures as indicative to plus or minus fifteen per cent, which your two engineers were not told and could not have known, because the standard is internal.

Second, fifteen per cent does not get you from 4.6 to 1.2, and I am not going to pretend that it does.

Third, and this is the answer you are actually going to print: I do not know what was on the end of that circuit. I have had two people looking since your letter arrived. Our property records show a right of way, a pole line, a termination structure and a padmount enclosure inside a federal fence we have never had a key to. There is no service agreement, no account, no load letter, no design memorandum and no correspondence. The circuit was energised before the earliest record we hold and de-energised in 1988 by a work order that gives no reason and is signed by a supervisor who died in 2004.

I would rather say that than say something tidier. A company that cannot produce the paperwork for four thousand six hundred kilowatts of its own delivered energy has a records problem, and I am not going to dress it up as a policy.

What I will not accept is the inference. You have a load and a period and a duty cycle, and every one of those is consistent with a large industrial capacitor installation, a test load bank, an accelerator of some ordinary kind, or a klystron plant with storage in front of it. It is also consistent with things I would not print. The tapes do not choose between them and neither should you.

One last thing, and I mean it as a request rather than a complaint. If the property file ever comes out of that federal agency, send it to me. I have been asking for eleven days and I work for the company that built the line.

Published unedited under our right-of-reply guarantee.

How was this story?

We publish the result, whatever it is. Reader verdicts appear on the front page and in our newsroom metrics.

2,348 verdicts · 79.0% loved it

Readers' Letters 0

Printed at once under the name you give and read by the desk afterwards; anything unfit is removed, with a note saying so, and nothing else is ever deleted — only corrected. Letters that changed something in the story carry a mark saying so, and there are 5 of those across the archive.

  1. No letters yet on this story. Yours would be the first.

Write to the desk