Wednesday, October 7, 2026
They Buried
We Dug It Up
⌕ Search
PX-2173
PUBLISHED — OPEN ACCESS
INVENTED FOR A FICTIONAL NEWSPAPER

The 2021 slab-avalanche paper, filed with the 1959 autopsy findings it is calibrated against and the post-publication expedition reports

Origin
A peer-reviewed earth-sciences journal; a Soviet prosecutorial file released in stages since 1990; three expedition reports
Dated
paper 28 January 2021; autopsies 1959; expeditions 2021–2022
Extent
paper 11 with supplementary; autopsy extracts 14; expedition reports 38 pages
Status
accepted
Redactions
None. The autopsy extracts describe injuries to named people and are quoted only as far as the mechanism requires.

Chain of custody

All three are public and this newspaper obtained nothing. They are filed together because separately each is routine and together they are the only test this event permits: a model published, the claim carried loudly enough that people went and looked, and reports from the place that are consistent with it. The sequence was nobody's plan.

Held by: They Buried, document room

Excerpt

[From the paper] …a slab avalanche is a PLAUSIBLE explanation. The word is
the authors' own and appears in the section heading.

[Calibration] Injury thresholds derived from automotive impact studies of the
1970s; snow behaviour adapted from an animation studio's material point
method implementation.

[From the 1959 file] Rib and skull fractures; no external wounds consistent
with them. Left unexplained.

[From the expedition reports] Avalanche activity recorded at the location.

Transcribed by the data desk. Line breaks follow the original. Bracketed matter is ours.

Editor's note

Filed for the distance between two words. The paper says plausible; the coverage said solved. The document desk notes that plausible is a claim about a mechanism and solved is a claim about an event, and that the second cannot be earned by a model alone — only by going to the place, which is the third item in this file and the reason it is here.

Cited in