He Made Them Up, Made Money, And Kept The Letters.
The men in black entered the world in a 1956 book by a West Virginia publisher. He wrote to one collaborator afterwards: evidently the fans swallowed this one with a gulp. His whole archive is in a public library.
A months-long reporting project. Documents cited below are held in The Vault and available to readers.
CLARKSBURG, W.Va. — The men in black have an address.
It is a public library in Clarksburg, West Virginia, in the papers of a small-press publisher who died in 1984. Boxes 12 to 16. You need a reader's card, which is free, and you need to ask at the desk.
Our correspondent was the only person in the room both days.
Where they enter the world
A man in Connecticut closed his flying saucer club in September 1953 and said that three men in dark suits had called on him and told him to stop.
That is the seed, and this newspaper is not going to decide what happened to him. He may have been lying, frightened, unwell, or telling the truth. He is dead and it is not ours to settle.
What happened next is documented to the page.
A publisher in West Virginia turned it into a book in 1956, and it is in that book that they acquire the black suits, the black car, the flat delivery and the arriving-at-your-door. Not in 1953. In 1956, in print, for sale.
He reviewed his own book
He also ran a magazine.
The issue that came out after the book appeared carries a review of the book. The review is warm. Both are in the same collection, one box apart, and our correspondent read them in the same afternoon.
This is not a scandal. It is what a small press was, and anybody who has run one will recognise it immediately.
The letter
The thing this newspaper drove to West Virginia for is a letter.
In the late 1960s he asked an eighteen-year-old correspondent to invent an encounter. The young man did: he wrote it up under a doctorate he did not have and a name that was not his, describing being silenced by three figures after learning what the craft really were.
The publisher printed it.
Then he wrote to the young man about how it had gone, and the sentence in that letter is the reason this story exists:
Evidently the fans swallowed this one with a gulp.
The young man grew up and, in 1998, wrote the whole thing out himself under his own name, in a magazine of record. This newspaper did not have to find him or persuade him. He said it in public twenty-eight years ago and it has been sitting there since.
The book nobody quotes
The man whose 1953 visit started it published his own account in 1962.
In it, the visitors are from Antarctica.
Almost nothing that circulates about the men in black comes from that book, which is odd, given that its author is the only person who claimed to have met them. The version everybody knows is the publisher's version, and the difference between the two is a fact you can check in an afternoon.
What our folklorist would not let us end on
Professor Sunniva Delacroix-Obiora read our draft and asked to reply, on the grounds that we were aiming at the wrong target, and her statement runs in full at the foot of this page.
Her argument is that a thousand saucer pamphlets were invented in that decade and are gone, and something happened to this one, and why is the only question worth asking.
Her answer is the best paragraph anybody has given this desk this year. Everything else in that literature is about them — their craft, their metals, their intentions. The men in black are the only part that is about us: about what happens to an ordinary person who finds something out. They wear suits. They arrive at your door. They are polite. They know your name.
That is not a story about space. It is a story about institutions, told by people who felt small in front of them, in a decade that had given them reasons to.
He did not invent the feeling. He found it, and he was a good enough publisher to know what he had.
What this story establishes
That the men in black as everybody pictures them were assembled by one man in one town who wrote the book, printed it, reviewed it in his own magazine, commissioned at least one hoax in writing, and kept the paperwork.
The paperwork is the point. He could have burned it. Publishers burn things.
He gave it to a library instead, and the library catalogued it, and it has been on a shelf in Clarksburg for forty years waiting for somebody to drive over and ask.
The six o'clock edition
Three stories a morning, in your inbox before the coffee is made.
Sources & Method
The correspondence is in a public library and nobody had gone. So our correspondent drove to Clarksburg, filled in a reader's slip, and read boxes 12 to 16 over two days. Everything quoted in this story is a document in that collection or a published article by the person who wrote it, and the finding aid that points to each one is linked from this page.
Who we spoke to
- The publisher's papers, A named collection in a county public library. Read across two days in the reading room; boxes 12 to 16 April 2026 No appointment needed. The finding aid is online. Our correspondent was the only reader in the room both days.
- The 1956 book and the full run of his magazine, Published, and held in the same collection. Read; the magazine's review of the book is in the issue after the book appeared April 2026
- Ottilie Marchbanks-Nwachukwu, Librarian, special collections. Interviewed at the desk and again by telephone April 2026 Says most enquiries are from film people, and almost none from anybody who believes it.
- Prof. Sunniva Delacroix-Obiora, Folklorist. Interviewed by video call twice May 2026 Argues the interesting question is not whether he lied but why the invention took, when a thousand others did not.
- The published confession of a collaborator, An article in a magazine of record, 1998. Read; he wrote it himself, under his own name, describing what he had done at eighteen 2026 This newspaper did not approach him. He said it in public and it stands on its own.
Documents
- PX-2089 — Letter from a small-press publisher to a young collaborator, on the reception of a hoax the two of them had placed in print accepted
What we could not confirm
- What happened in September 1953. A man closed his club and said three men in dark suits had called on him. He may have been lying, frightened, unwell, or telling the truth. He is not here to ask and this newspaper is not going to decide it for him.
- How much of the rest was invented. We can show one hoax, in writing, in the man's own hand, and a magazine that reviewed its own publisher's book. We cannot draw a line through the whole archive.
- Why it took. Our folklorist thinks this is the only interesting question and she does not claim to have answered it either.
How Others Covered This
The same events, as reported elsewhere on the same day. We list what each outlet had that we did not, as well as what we had that they did not — including where we come off worse. Why we print this.
-
ApertureThe Saucerian
A profile of the publisher as a figure in American letters — a small-press operator who invented a folklore and knew he was doing it.
Had that we did not
Him, at length, and three people who knew him. Ours has one.
Left out
The archive. Their piece never mentions that the papers are public.
-
The Meridian TelegraphTHE SILENCERS ARE REAL AND THEY HAVE A BUDGET
Reported the men in black as an operating programme with a line item.
Had that we did not
Nothing.
Left out
The book, the publisher, the pseudonym, the collaborator's own published confession, and the fact that the first man to describe them later said they came from Antarctica.
-
They Buriedthis newspaperHe Made Them Up, Made Money, And Kept The Letters.
Went to the library and read the correspondence, which is the whole story and takes a day.
Had that we did not
The letters, the finding aid, and the run of the magazine.
Left out
Our headline says he made them up. He made up a great deal; whether he made up the 1953 visit or found a man who believed in it is a distinction our headline does not draw. — V. Ashcombe-Doyle, standards editor
How was this story?
We publish the result, whatever it is. Reader verdicts appear on the front page and in our newsroom metrics.
Readers' Letters 0
Printed at once under the name you give and read by the desk afterwards; anything unfit is removed, with a note saying so, and nothing else is ever deleted — only corrected. Letters that changed something in the story carry a mark saying so, and there are 5 of those across the archive.