This One Is True. They Met In Geneva And Shortened The Bulb.
Four firms signed an agreement in 1924 capping lamp life at 1,000 hours, then fined each other for making bulbs that lasted. A federal court agreed in 1949. It is the best-documented conspiracy on this beat and nobody writes to us.
A months-long reporting project. Documents cited below are held in The Vault and available to readers.
GENEVA — On 23 December 1924, representatives of four lamp manufacturers met in Geneva and agreed to limit the working life of a household bulb to 1,000 hours.
Before that, 1,500 to 2,000 hours was normal and long life was advertised. After it, members who made lamps that lasted too long were fined — on a sliding scale, per lamp, per hour over the standard.
The schedules survive. They are ordinary office paperwork, ruled and totted up, and they are the most chilling documents this newspaper has photographed all year.
Why we are leading with this
Because it is true, and because being true is not what gets a conspiracy attention.
This newspaper receives about eleven hundred letters a year about a tablet, and roughly none about the Phoebus cartel. The tablet is a fragment with an eleven-month hole in its provenance. The cartel is a signed agreement, an enforcement regime with a fine schedule, and a finding by a United States federal court.
United States v. General Electric Co., 82 F. Supp. 753. New Jersey, 1949. Seventy-four pages, free online, and the court states plainly that the company had the power to determine lamp life across the industry and that profit was its main consideration in setting it.
You can read it this afternoon. Almost nobody has.
The part that is genuinely arguable
Here is the counter-argument, at the length it deserves, because a story that leaves it out is doing the cartel's work.
Filament life and efficacy trade against each other. Run a tungsten filament hotter and you get more light per watt and a shorter life. Run it cooler and it lasts longer and gives you less light for the same electricity.
Professor Emeka Sørensen-Bhatt walked our correspondent through the arithmetic. A lamp engineered for 2,500 hours at the same wattage is a dimmer lamp, and over the life of the bulb the extra electricity costs the owner more than the bulbs saved.
So 1,000 hours is not an arbitrary number. There is a real optimum somewhere near there, and it depends on the price of electricity.
He then said the thing that matters.
"All of that would be a perfectly good defence if they had published the calculation and competed. They did not publish it. They fined each other. You do not need a fine schedule to enforce physics."
The bulb in Livermore
There is a lamp in a fire station in California that has been burning almost continuously since 1901.
It is real, it is remarkable, and it is about four watts — dim enough that you would not read by it. It is a hand-blown carbon-filament lamp run far below its rating, which is exactly the tradeoff above, taken to its extreme.
It is evidence that a bulb can last forever. It is not evidence that a bulb can last forever and light a room, and the accounts that use it as the second thing are being careless with something they could check with one telephone call to the fire department, which is what we did.
What this desk takes from it
The best-documented conspiracy on our beat is a hundred years old, was settled in court seventy-seven years ago, is taught in competition law, and generates almost no correspondence.
Our correspondent has a theory about why, and it is only a theory, so it is in the last paragraph where a theory belongs: a conspiracy that has been proved is over. It has a citation and a verdict and nothing left to argue about, and the argument was always the point.
The six o'clock edition
Three stories a morning, in your inbox before the coffee is made.
Sources & Method
This story required no leak, no source and no document that is not public. The judgment is free online. The cartel's own agreement and fine schedules are in an archive that answers letters. We then did the thing that gets left out — asked a lighting engineer whether 1,000 hours had any legitimate basis — and printed his answer at length, because a story that omits the strongest counter-argument is doing the same job as the cartel.
Who we spoke to
- Dr. Katarzyna Obiora-Lindqvist, Historian of industrial cartels. Interviewed in person in Geneva; walked our correspondent through the surviving agreement and fine schedules May 2026
- United States v. General Electric Co., 82 F. Supp. 753 (D.N.J. 1949), Public judgment. Read in full 2026 Free online. It is 74 pages and the relevant findings are not buried.
- Prof. Emeka Sørensen-Bhatt, Lighting engineer. Interviewed by video call June 2026 Explains the life-versus-efficacy tradeoff and is emphatic that it does not excuse the cartel.
- Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department, Custodians of the Centennial Light. Telephone June 2026 Confirmed the bulb's rating. It is about four watts.
- Surviving Phoebus testing and fine schedules, Archive copies. Photographed in Geneva May 2026
Documents
- PX-1998 — Phoebus cartel — 1924 agreement, 1925 testing standard and the fine schedules accepted
What we could not confirm
- How much shorter the average lamp actually became in service. The agreement set a standard and fined deviation; what rolled off the lines varied by factory and the production records are patchy.
- Whether any modern manufacturer does anything comparable. We looked and found no evidence, and absence of evidence over an industry this size is weak.
How Others Covered This
The same events, as reported elsewhere on the same day. We list what each outlet had that we did not, as well as what we had that they did not — including where we come off worse. Why we print this.
-
Signal & LedgerCartel Case Still Cited In Competition Teaching
Ran it as antitrust history, which is what it is.
Had that we did not
Two competition lawyers on why the 1949 judgment is still taught.
Left out
The engineering tradeoff, which is the only part of this that is genuinely arguable.
-
The Hollow PostTHEY'VE BEEN KILLING YOUR BULBS FOR 100 YEARS
Correct in outline, and does not mention that the cartel ended in 1939.
Had that we did not
Nothing.
Left out
That it collapsed eighty-seven years ago; that a court dealt with it; and the efficacy tradeoff, which means a 2,500-hour filament lamp is a dimmer lamp.
-
They Buriedthis newspaperThis One Is True. They Met In Geneva And Shortened The Bulb.
Reported the documented conspiracy and the real engineering tradeoff in the same piece, because both are true and only printing one is how you get lied to.
Had that we did not
The fine schedules and a lighting engineer on efficacy.
Left out
Our headline says 'this one is true', which invites the reader to think the others on our beat are false. Some are. That is a judgement the headline makes and the story does not. — V. Ashcombe-Doyle, standards editor
How was this story?
We publish the result, whatever it is. Reader verdicts appear on the front page and in our newsroom metrics.
Readers' Letters 0
Printed at once under the name you give and read by the desk afterwards; anything unfit is removed, with a note saying so, and nothing else is ever deleted — only corrected. Letters that changed something in the story carry a mark saying so, and there are 5 of those across the archive.