Wednesday, October 7, 2026
They Buried
We Dug It Up
⌕ Search
ObituaryObituaries Those Who Knew Too Much

Verity Quist, Who Beat This Newspaper, Dies At 69

We printed her name as attending a conference she had never heard of. She filed a nine-page complaint, won, and then wrote to say the correction was the best part. She is survived by clause 4b.

The board's ruling, as posted to her, with her annotations. Engraved from a family photograph

In July of last year this newspaper printed her name in a list of people who had attended a private conference. She had not attended it. She had never heard of it.

What she did about it

Not what most people do, which is nothing, or a furious email.

She wrote to us once, politely, and got a reply she described to her son as "immediate and completely useless." Then she filed a complaint with the Fourth Estate Complaints Board, wrote a nine-page submission with a chronology, and won.

The board found our transcription negligent — a name read at speed off a phone photograph, checked by one person instead of two — ordered a correction of equal prominence, and criticised the practice rather than the individual, which is the harder and more useful finding.

Our correction ran on 14 July 2025 and remains permanently in the corrections archive. The board's ruling is published in full on our external assessments page, including the part where it says the harm should not have occurred.

The letter afterwards

Three weeks later she wrote to the reply editor again, unprompted.

Tomas Wexler has kept the letter and read it aloud, twice, at the standards meeting that changed our transcription rule.

"She wrote that the correction was the best part," he said. "Not winning. The correction. She said the thing that had actually upset her was not seeing her name in a newspaper — it was the idea that somebody, somewhere, might read it in ten years and believe it. And that a correction is the only machine anyone has ever built for that."

What changed because of her

No document at this newspaper is now transcribed by fewer than two people, independently, and every published transcription states the magnification at which it was read.

That rule exists because a retired procurement manager in Stirling filled in a form.

She is survived by her son, two grandchildren, and clause 4b.

Sources & Method

An obituary of someone who successfully complained about this newspaper. The conflict is disclosed in the standfirst and again in the sources box. Her son read this piece before publication and asked for one change, which we made: he wanted her occupation in the first line.

Who we spoke to

  1. Callum Quist-Adeyemi, Her son. Interviewed by telephone 16 July 2026
  2. The Fourth Estate Complaints Board, Public adjudication record. Published ruling 2025/311 September 2025
  3. Tomas Wexler, This newspaper's reply editor. Handled the complaint and is a source in this obituary 2025 They Buried was the respondent in the complaint described here. We say so at the top rather than at the bottom.
  4. Stirling registrar, Public record. Record request July 2026 Cause of death recorded as pancreatic cancer.
Disclosure. They Buried was the respondent in the complaint this obituary describes, and lost. The obituaries editor had no involvement in the original story or the complaint.

How was this story?

We publish the result, whatever it is. Reader verdicts appear on the front page and in our newsroom metrics.

1,378 verdicts · 61.0% loved it

Readers' Letters 0

Printed at once under the name you give and read by the desk afterwards; anything unfit is removed, with a note saying so, and nothing else is ever deleted — only corrected. Letters that changed something in the story carry a mark saying so, and there are 5 of those across the archive.

  1. No letters yet on this story. Yours would be the first.

Write to the desk