The Marines Found Nothing. The Puma Was Real, Tame, And Fat.
In 1983 the Ministry of Agriculture sent Royal Marines to Exmoor to kill a beast. They found no tracks and no lairs. Three years earlier a farmer in Glen Affric had already caught one, in a cage baited with offal.
A months-long reporting project. Documents cited below are held in The Vault and available to readers.
CANNICH, Inverness-shire — She was too fat to catch anything.
That is the first thing the record says about the only big cat ever taken alive in Britain, and it is the thing nobody repeats. When the farmer's trap closed on 29 October 1980, what was inside was a puma who was overweight, extremely tame, and who would not eat meat unless somebody had prepared it for her.
She had not been killing sheep. She had been somebody's.
The trap
Donald Noble farmed at Kerrow, near Cannich in Glen Affric, and had spent years listening to neighbours describe an animal.
He built a cage and baited it with sheep's offal. Our correspondent has seen his drawing of it and it is the drawing of a man who has built a lot of things out of what was in the yard.
It worked on the first serious attempt, which is more than the Royal Marines managed.
The Marines
In 1983 a farmer near South Molton lost more than a hundred sheep in three months, and the Ministry of Agriculture sent the Royal Marines to Exmoor to find and kill whatever was doing it.
This is not folklore. A government department deployed troops against a rumoured animal.
They stayed for weeks. They found no animal, no tracks, no droppings and no lair, and they said so.
The law that probably did it
In 1976 an Act required anybody keeping a dangerous wild animal privately to hold a licence and to build enclosures that satisfied an inspector.
That is a reasonable law and it had a predictable effect on people who had bought a leopard cub in the sixties and were now facing an inspection.
Nobody knows how many animals were let go, and nobody can, because a release is the thing you do instead of registering.
What thirty years of reports actually contain
We stopped asking whether there are big cats in Britain and asked what happens to a report once somebody makes one.
A police force keeps a log. We asked for thirty years of it, waited eleven months, got it in four tranches, and classified every entry.
Eight hundred and twelve reports. A hundred and ninety-four attended. Forty-one times there was something physical to pick up — hair, a cast, once a carcass.
None of the forty-one was a non-native cat.
The raw log is published with this story. If you think our classification is self-serving, redo it; that is why it is there.
The pose
Ishbel Farquharson-Adeyemi curates the museum where the animal is now displayed, and our correspondent asked why she is mounted reclining rather than snarling.
The answer came without hesitation and is the best thing in this story. The wildlife park staff who had looked after her for the rest of her life asked the taxidermist not to make her snarl.
She had been, they said, a loveable and gentle beast.
What this desk thinks
Professor Lachlan Oyelaran-Sinclair's reply runs at the foot of this page and it separates two questions that have been fought over as one.
Has a big cat ever been at large in Britain? Settled since 1980. Yes. There is one in a glass case in Inverness and there were probably others.
Is there a breeding population? Almost certainly not, and the reason is arithmetic rather than scepticism: solitary animals with enormous ranges, dropped a few at a time across an island, mostly never meet.
Which leaves the picture this desk now holds. Not a hidden species. A slow leak of individual animals out of private collections after 1976, most of them dead by 1990 — and a number of people who saw one, were not mistaken, and have been laughed at for forty years.
Our correspondent has spent thirty years being told he is credulous for taking such people seriously. He would like it noted that in this instance they were right, the animal was real, and it was fat because somebody had been feeding it in a shed.
The six o'clock edition
Three stories a morning, in your inbox before the coffee is made.
Sources & Method
We stopped asking whether there are big cats in Britain and asked what happens to a report after somebody makes one. That is answerable: a police force keeps a log. We requested thirty years of it, waited eleven months, classified every entry by how far it got, and published the raw file so that anybody who thinks our classification is self-serving can redo it.
Who we spoke to
- A police force's wildlife-report log, 1996–2026, Obtained under freedom of information. Requested; released in four tranches over eleven months; classified by this newspaper and published in full 2025–2026 Our classification is ours. The raw log is published so anybody may reclassify it and say we were wrong.
- The 1980 capture file, Council and wildlife park records, and contemporary press. Read; the trap's dimensions come from the farmer's own drawing 2026
- Ishbel Farquharson-Adeyemi, Curator, the museum where the animal is displayed. Interviewed in the gallery, beside the case May 2026 Answered the question about the reclining pose without being asked twice, and it is the best thing in this story.
- Prof. Lachlan Oyelaran-Sinclair, Wildlife biologist; works on non-native carnivore establishment. Interviewed by video call twice June 2026 Explains why a handful of released animals does not make a population, and why that is the whole question.
Documents
- PX-2179 — Thirty years of one police force's wildlife-report log, 1996–2026, with the 1980 capture file accepted
What we could not confirm
- Whether any non-native cat is alive in Britain now. Our log covers one force area and stops at the county line. Absence in one file is not absence in a country, and this desk has said so on every story it has ever filed.
- How many were released after 1976. It is widely believed some were. Believed is the right word: no register of releases exists, because a release is the thing you do instead of registering.
- What killed the Exmoor sheep. Something did, over a hundred of them, and the Marines did not establish what. A dog is the likeliest answer and likeliest is not an answer.
How Others Covered This
The same events, as reported elsewhere on the same day. We list what each outlet had that we did not, as well as what we had that they did not — including where we come off worse. Why we print this.
-
ApertureThe Beast Economy
A piece on what a rumoured animal does to a rural economy — the tourism, the pub, the man who sells the plaster casts.
Had that we did not
The economics, and the publican, who is a much better interview than anyone we found.
Left out
The 1980 capture, which it mentions in a clause.
-
The Hollow PostTHEY KNOW THE CATS ARE OUT THERE
Reported the 1983 Marine deployment as proof of a cover-up: the state would not send troops for nothing.
Had that we did not
That the Marines were sent. They were, by the Ministry of Agriculture, and it is extraordinary.
Left out
That the Marines found nothing and said so; and that the state's own answer to this question is a stuffed puma on public display in Inverness.
-
They Buriedthis newspaperThe Marines Found Nothing. The Puma Was Real, Tame, And Fat.
Reported the capture, the law that probably caused it, and thirty years of a police log.
Had that we did not
The log, and the farmer's own account of building the trap.
Left out
Our headline gets a laugh out of an animal that spent four years in a cage having been abandoned by somebody. — V. Ashcombe-Doyle, standards editor
How was this story?
We publish the result, whatever it is. Reader verdicts appear on the front page and in our newsroom metrics.
Readers' Letters 0
Printed at once under the name you give and read by the desk afterwards; anything unfit is removed, with a note saying so, and nothing else is ever deleted — only corrected. Letters that changed something in the story carry a mark saying so, and there are 5 of those across the archive.