Wednesday, October 7, 2026
They Buried
We Dug It Up
⌕ Search

The Gravity-Shielding Rig Is In A Crate In Huntsville. Inventory Number 4471.

A property-disposal record locates the apparatus built to test the 1996 rotating-superconductor claim: a 300-millimetre disc, a cryostat, two lock-in amplifiers. It cost $607,000, returned a null in 2002, and has been available to borrow ever since.

Bay 12, aisle end. The crate is the long one, and the number is stencilled on the short side. Engraved from the contractor's inventory photographs

Inventory number 4471. A federal contractor's warehouse outside Huntsville holds it under a standing property-disposal record, which this newspaper obtained by telephoning and asking for it, and which lists the contents in one line of fixed-width type: one 300-millimetre disc, one rotating cryostat, two lock-in amplifiers, one differential balance, one test log.

That is the apparatus built to settle the 1996 rotating-superconductor claim — the claim that a spinning superconducting disc reduces the weight of whatever sits above it.

It was built. It was funded to $607,000. It was cooled and run sixty-one times. It returned a null in March 2002, the final report is public, and the repository's own counter says that report has been downloaded thirty-one times. Two of those are us.

Figure What is in the crate, laid out as it was on the bench
Rotating cryostatLiquid helium at 4.2 kelvin. Cooled and run sixty-one times, March 2000 to December 2001.Magnetic bearingFailed at 3,100 rpm on 8 November 2001. Replacement assembly quoted at $900, six weeks.Drive motorRated to 6,000 rpm. Never asked for more than 3,100.300mm disc, two sectorsSintered 1999. A rim crack is photographed on page 11 of the report.Differential balanceResolution two parts in ten million. Nothing outside its own noise, in sixty-one runs.Two lock-in amplifiersBoth still on the inventory, and both, the contractor says, still boxed with their manuals.Test log, 214 pagesHandwritten by three people. In the crate. Unrequested for twenty-four years.Schematic. The bench was 3.4m by 1.8m; the crate is 2.1m long and the rig was boxed in four sub-assemblies.
Two items are flagged. One is the magnetic bearing that failed at 3,100 revolutions per minute against a claim that requires five thousand. The other is the test log, which is inside the crate, which has been available to any accredited institution since 2002, and which nobody has asked to read. They Buried, from the 2002 final report and the property-disposal record

What page three says

The disc was never spun at 5,000 revolutions per minute.

Five thousand is the figure the original claim requires. The rig's magnetic bearing failed at 3,100 on 8 November 2001 and was not replaced, because the vendor's quote arrived with eleven weeks left on the grant and what remained on the line would not cover the part, the fitting and the recommissioning together.

None of that is a revelation. It is on page three of the published final report, under a heading that reads Limitations, and it has been there since March 2002.

The bearing

The quote in the file is $900 for the bearing assembly, six weeks' delivery.

We are putting that number high in this story and we should be plain about what it is. It is the part. It is not the fitting, the realignment, the recertification of a helium loop that has been dry for twenty-four years, or the two years of a professional life that Dr. Roselle Achterberg-Owusu says the work would actually take. She ran the programme, she disputes our framing, and her reply is printed below at length because she is largely right.

What the $900 is, is the reason the running stopped. Not a judgement about physics. A part, a quote, and a date on a calendar.

Twenty-four years of nobody asking

The disposal record carries a field for transfer requests. Any accredited institution may enter one. The field is blank, and has been blank since 2002.

The test log — 214 pages, handwritten in the margins by three people — is inside the crate. Nobody has asked to read it.

So we asked. We wrote to the disposal officer named on the record at 09:14 on a Tuesday and enquired whether this newspaper might borrow the apparatus.

The answer came at 09:25. Eleven minutes. It said yes, subject to a standard loan agreement and proof of a cryogenics-rated facility, which we do not have and are now looking for a partner to provide.

What this desk takes from it

The rig exists. It is in a numbered box, in a numbered bay, in a building anybody may telephone during business hours.

The report saying the experiment found nothing has been public since 2002 and has been opened thirty-one times.

And the reason a famous claim about gravity has sat unsettled for thirty years is not that anybody hid the apparatus. It is that a bearing failed at 3,100 revolutions with eleven weeks left on the grant, what was left on the line covered the part but not the fitting and the recommissioning, and nobody since has wanted to spend two years of a career establishing that something does not happen.

We asked to borrow it and were told yes in eleven minutes. If your institution has a cryogenics-rated bay and would like to finish this, the desk would like to hear from you.

Sources & Method

We did not re-argue the physics. We asked where the apparatus went, which is a property question and therefore answerable: a disposal record, a bay number, one telephone call. Then we asked to borrow it, and we have printed the reply and its time stamp.

Who we spoke to

  1. Federal property-disposal record, item 4471, One page, unredacted, with the transfer-request field blank. Requested by telephone on 4 August 2026; emailed the same afternoon August 2026 We asked whether a request was normally required in writing. We were told no.
  2. Final report on the rotating-superconductor experiment, March 2002, Public, 88 pages, in the agency's open repository. Downloaded. The repository's counter reports thirty-one downloads since 2003 2002 Two of the thirty-one are this newspaper. We are not able to say who the other twenty-nine were.
  3. Dr. Roselle Achterberg-Owusu, Principal investigator, 1999–2002. Interviewed by telephone twice; read the full draft before publication August 2026 Disagrees with the framing of this story. Her reply is printed unedited and is the best thing on this page.
  4. Merle Kastberg, Property disposal officer for the holding contractor. Email, printed with its time stamps 11 August 2026 Answered our loan enquiry in eleven minutes.
  5. The author of the 1996 claim, Approached for comment. Written to twice at the last address held by his former institution; no reply to either letter July and August 2026 We record that we tried, and that we do not know whether the letters arrived.

What we could not confirm

  • What the rig would show at 5,000 revolutions per minute. Nobody has run it there. This story is about a machine that was never taken to the speed the claim requires, and we cannot tell you what it would have done if it had been.
  • Whether the disc is still usable. It has sat unpowered in a sealed crate for twenty-four years, sintered ceramic degrades, and the contractor will not open the box without a signed transfer. Our $900 figure is the 2001 quote for the bearing assembly alone; recommissioning is costed nowhere, and the principal investigator puts it in the tens of thousands.
  • Who the other twenty-nine downloads were. The repository does not retain that and told us so in one sentence.
Disclosure. This newspaper spent $1,180 on this story: two telephone interviews, copying charges of $60, and one day of a correspondent's time in Huntsville. No agency or contractor paid for any part of it.

How Others Covered This

The same events, as reported elsewhere on the same day. We list what each outlet had that we did not, as well as what we had that they did not — including where we come off worse. Why we print this.

  1. The Meridian Telegraph
    The Antigravity Machine Is Sitting In A Government Warehouse

    Treated storage as concealment, and the bay number as a leak.

    Had that we did not

    The disposal record, credited to 'documents obtained'. It is obtained by telephoning and asking.

    Left out

    That the report saying the experiment found nothing has been public for twenty-four years, and that the crate is available on request to any accredited body.

  2. The Continental Wire
    Agency Says 2002 Gravity Experiment Ended Without Result

    Ran the agency's 340-word statement and stopped.

    Had that we did not

    The statement, verbatim, and the funding figure.

    Left out

    Page three. A reader of the wire item does not learn that the disc never reached the speed the claim requires.

  3. They Buriedthis newspaper
    The Gravity-Shielding Rig Is In A Crate In Huntsville. Inventory Number 4471.

    Asked where the apparatus went — a property question, therefore answerable — and then asked to borrow it.

    Had that we did not

    The disposal record, the bay, the loan reply and its time stamp.

    Left out

    We put a $900 bearing high in this story knowing it was the cheapest number in the file. The principal investigator is right that recommissioning costs far more, and our framing was tidier than the facts. — V. Ashcombe-Doyle, standards editor

Right of Reply

They Buried contacted Dr. Roselle Achterberg-Owusu, principal investigator on the 1999–2002 experiment on 12 August 2026, with the full draft and the figure attached and no deadline imposed. Replied on 15 August 2026, at length. Printed in full and unedited.

You have found the crate. Congratulations. I have known where it is for twenty-four years.

I want to argue with your framing, and then I want to agree with your conclusion, in that order.

The framing. You say the obstacle is a $900 bearing. That is the price of the part. It is not the price of the experiment. To take that rig to five thousand revolutions you need the assembly, an alignment fixture that we borrowed and returned in 2001, a helium loop that has been dry since the first Bush administration and would have to be recertified, and a person. The person is the expensive item. Two years of somebody's career, at the stage of a career when they are choosing what they are going to be. Call it sixty to eighty thousand dollars of hardware and facility time and one whole scientist. Your number is true and it is the smallest true number in the file, and I notice you put it high in the story rather than low.

The second thing. You imply, gently, that we were incurious. I asked three times for the money to finish. The answers I have in writing are all about the fiscal year. Not one of them is about physics, and not one of them is a refusal. They are all a calendar. I would ask your readers to sit with how ordinary that is, because it is the single most common way a scientific question does not get answered, and it makes no headline anywhere.

The third thing, which is the one I actually care about. A null result has no constituency. Nobody defends it and nobody attacks it. If we had found a weight change, that report would have been read three million times and there would be a bearing on that rig within a fortnight. We found nothing, so the report has been read thirty-one times, and two of those are your newspaper, and I am grateful and I am also embarrassed on behalf of my field.

Where I agree with you. The crate should have been borrowed by somebody years ago. Anybody could have asked. I could have asked. I did not, because I had moved on to work that was funded, and because I did not want to spend my forties being the woman who spun the disc again.

One last thing, and I would like it printed. Your disclosure says this article cost you eleven hundred and eighty dollars. That is more than the bearing.

Published unedited under our right-of-reply guarantee.

How was this story?

We publish the result, whatever it is. Reader verdicts appear on the front page and in our newsroom metrics.

943 verdicts · 99.8% loved it

Readers' Letters 0

Printed at once under the name you give and read by the desk afterwards; anything unfit is removed, with a note saying so, and nothing else is ever deleted — only corrected. Letters that changed something in the story carry a mark saying so, and there are 5 of those across the archive.

  1. No letters yet on this story. Yours would be the first.

Write to the desk