---
title: "Drusilla Okpara-Fenn, 88, Sat Against The Wall Of 31 Committees For 34 Years."
dek: "Officials rotated out every eighteen months and she did not, because her grade sat one band below the rotation. She kept 4,112 index cards on quorum, seating and who would not sit with whom, then sealed them until 2039."
kind: obit (Obituary)
desk: Shadow Governance
author: Marcus Oyelaran and Gilbert Ames (fictional)
published: 2026-08-21T06:00:00Z
url: https://theyburied.com/article/obit-drusilla-okpara-fenn
tags: obituary, Whitehall, committees, The National Archives, civil service, records
genre: satire
status: fiction — nothing in this story happened; every person, source and document is invented
---

# Drusilla Okpara-Fenn, 88, Sat Against The Wall Of 31 Committees For 34 Years.

*Officials rotated out every eighteen months and she did not, because her grade sat one band below the rotation. She kept 4,112 index cards on quorum, seating and who would not sit with whom, then sealed them until 2039.*

She was present at 288 consecutive meetings of one committee.

In the same years, forty-seven ministers and chairmen used the seat at the head of that table, and 213 officials used the fourteen seats around it. Every one of them left. Drusilla Okpara-Fenn, who sat against the north wall on a chair she had brought from a previous office, did not.

She died on 3 August at her home in Surbiton, aged 88. Her daughter and the certificate both give the cause as a stroke.

> **Figure:** One committee room, and who was allowed to leave it — see https://theyburied.com/article/obit-drusilla-okpara-fenn

## Thirty-one committees

Between March 1985 and her retirement in June 2019 she was committee secretary to thirty-one interdepartmental bodies — standing groups, working parties, two joint boards, and one thing called a liaison forum that met eleven times and was never formally wound up.

She wrote the agendas. She counted the quorum. She booked the rooms, chased the papers, and told people where to sit.

Twenty-two of the thirty-one kept no minutes. That is not irregular and it is not concealment: a body with no statutory basis and no power to decide anything is under no obligation to minute itself, and a great many do not.

## What she kept instead

A card index. Four drawers, 4,112 cards, her own classification, her own hand.

It went to the National Archives in July 2019, in one van, in one trip, as accession 2019/117. We have the accession list — sixty-one pages describing the cards, written by an archivist — and that is the whole of what we have. No reporter on this staff has read a single card.

## Why she stayed, which is the dull part

Because of a pay band.

We obtained the grading schedules and rotation instructions for 1985 to 2019 under freedom of information. Committee secretary at her level was graded E2. The eighteen-month rotation that moved policy officials in and out of those rooms applied from D1 upward.

Everyone senior to her was required to leave. She was not, and nobody appears to have asked whether she should.

That is the mechanism. Thirty-four years of the state's institutional memory were preserved because the post holding it was too junior to be promoted out of the building.

> You have found a pay band and called it an explanation.
>
> — Dame Honoria Ashfield-Bekele

## What is actually on the cards

The accession list runs to 214 headings, and it is not what anybody hopes.

The four largest are Quorum (589 cards), Room allocation (441), Circulation of papers (388), and Precedence — which turns out to mean who goes in to lunch first, in what order, and what happened in November 1991 when a deputy secretary and a Treasury official reached the sideboard together.

Ninety-one cards concern which official will not be in a room with which other official. They are cross-referenced, in both directions.

There is no heading for policy. There is no heading for a decision.

## Sixty-one cards headed 'Understandings'

There is one heading every reader of the list stops at, and it is the sixty-one cards filed under that word.

She never defined it. Neither did the archivist, whose entry reads, in full: *Understandings, 61 cards, 1988–2016, subject terms not established.*

They are closed until 1 January 2039. Dame Honoria Ashfield-Bekele, who sat on four of the bodies, says below what she believes the word meant, and expects us to find it dull.

## The form

The closure is not a state decision. It is a tick-box.

Deposit form ARCH/3, section 4, offers a closure period of nought, twenty, thirty, forty, fifty, sixty, seventy-five or one hundred years. On 14 May 2019 she ticked twenty. The adjacent box, for a reason, is optional. She left it empty.

Her daughter asked this newspaper for one change before publication, and we made it. We had written that she sat for thirty-four years on a hard chair. Bunmi Okpara-Fenn asked us to record that the chair was her mother's own, brought from an office in 1985, and moved by her twice when the room was refurbished.

## What this desk takes from it

Our correspondent has spent fourteen years on bodies that publish no minutes, and the working assumption of the beat has always been that a record exists somewhere and is being withheld from us.

Here the record was made — privately, by hand, at a grade too low to be noticed — and then handed to the state by a woman who filled in the form correctly and chose the shortest closure that covered the lifetimes of the people named in it.

Dame Honoria's reply runs below and is better than this obituary. It ends on a sentence this desk cannot get round: that she sat in that room for nineteen years and could not now describe the chair.

Drusilla Okpara-Fenn is survived by her daughter, three grandchildren, and four drawers at Kew that nobody may open for another twelve years.

## Sources (invented)

- The National Archives, accession 2019/117, Accession list — 61 pages describing 4,112 cards under 214 headings — Requested under the archive's publication scheme; released without redaction (Requested 4 August 2026, received 11 August)
- Bunmi Okpara-Fenn, Her daughter — Interviewed at the house in Surbiton, twice; read this piece before publication (August 2026)
- Dame Honoria Ashfield-Bekele, Retired Second Permanent Secretary; sat on four of the thirty-one bodies, 1988–2007 — Interviewed by telephone, then sent the full draft and replied in writing (August 2026)
- Grading schedules and rotation instructions, 1985–2019, Obtained under freedom of information in two tranches — Requested November 2025; released March and June 2026 (2025–2026)
- Attendance registers of one standing group, 1985–2019, Held at Kew, open, uncatalogued until 2021 — Read in the reading room over three days and counted twice (August 2026)

## What we could not confirm

- What is on the sixty-one cards headed 'Understandings'. They are closed until 1 January 2039. We asked the archive for early release on 12 August and were refused on 15 August; we have not appealed, and the reason is that an appeal costs more than this desk's annual documents budget.
- That she was present at all 288 meetings. For eleven sittings between October 1994 and February 1996 the register names the post and not the person. No one else held the post, so we have counted those eleven as hers. That is an inference, and it is ours, not the archive's.
- Why she chose twenty years rather than nought or thirty. Form ARCH/3 provides a box for a reason. She left it empty, the archive does not require it, and every account of her thinking in this story is second-hand.

## Right of reply

**Dame Honoria Ashfield-Bekele, retired Second Permanent Secretary** (Replied in writing on 19 August. Printed unedited.):

> I have read your draft twice. I think it is accurate and I think it is wrong, and I should like to take those in that order.
> 
> Accurate: her grade was E2, E2 was below the band the rotation applied to, and she therefore stayed while the rest of us were moved. You have the schedules. You have read them correctly. Nobody in that building ever made a decision to keep her; she was simply never the subject of a decision at all.
> 
> Wrong: you have found a pay band and called it an explanation. A pay band explains why she was available. It does not explain why she was used, and she was used constantly, by people who would have been embarrassed to say so.
> 
> And then there are the cards. You list the four largest headings — quorum, room allocation, circulation of papers, precedence at lunch — and you print them as comedy. I understand why. They are funny. They are also the machinery, and I do not think you have quite grasped that a committee which cannot make quorum makes no decision, and that a decision not made on the fourteenth is a policy that does not exist in March.
> 
> The ninety-one cards about which official will not sit with which other official are not gossip. They are the reason certain rooms worked and certain rooms did not, and the whole of that knowledge was held by one woman on a chair she had brought from another office, and none of it was ever written into a job description.
> 
> As to 'Understandings' — I am sorry to disappoint your readers and your headline writers both. It was our word for a thing four people agreed in a corridor that everyone afterwards behaved as though were true. It was not sinister. It was how a large organisation avoids convening a meeting about everything. There were sixty-one of them over twenty-eight years, which strikes me as a remarkably small number, and I would expect you to find them dull.
> 
> The closure period you have made so much of: the form offers nought, twenty, thirty, forty, fifty, sixty, seventy-five and one hundred. She ticked the shortest option that outlives the people named on the cards. That is not secrecy. It is manners, and it is the same instinct that made her fill in every box that was compulsory and no box that was not.
> 
> One last thing, and it is the reason I am writing at length rather than declining as I usually do. I sat in that room for nineteen years. I could not tell you the colour of her chair. I could not have told you her Christian name in 2001 and I am not certain I could have spelled her surname in 2007. That is my failure and not yours, and it is the obituary you should have written.

---
They Buried is a satirical newspaper. Every story, source, document and person in it is invented. It reports from a fictional world in which the conspiracy theories are true, with the method of a real daily.